236 So. 2d 430 - Stevens v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2009
1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ryals v. Douglas · Gulf Refining Co. v. Travis · Crawford v. BROWN · Parker v. Foy · Thomas v. Thomas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[p]ossession of real estate is constructive notice of the title in the occupant to the same extent as that imputed by the record of a deed to him thereto.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"It is the general rule in this state and elsewhere that when a transfer of property is made to one person and the purchase price is paid by another, a resulting trust arises in favor of the person who pays the purchase price. Ryals v. Douglas, 205 Miss. 695 , 39 So.2d 311 (1949); V Scott, Trusts § 440 (3d Ed. 1967); Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 440 (2d Ed. 1959)... . The burden is upon the transferee to establish that he was to receive the beneficial interest. Scott, supra." 236 So.2d at 432-433 . (Emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Savell v. Savell“Any notice sufficient to incite a party to inquiry is equivalent in law to notice of those further relevant facts which such inquiry, if pursued with reasonable diligence, would have disclosed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hans v. Hans
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.