236 So. 2d 448 - Robbin v. Brewer’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State ex rel. Clyatt v. Hocker · 70 So. 2d 293 - Blackburn v. Brorein · State Ex Rel. Gibbs v. Bloodworth · State Ex Rel. Davis v. Botts · 105 So. 2d 389 - International Shoe Co. v. Carmichael
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Prior to 1978 none of the Plaintiffs were ‘appointed by the governor upon the recommendation of the circuit judge or judges of the circuit’ as Official Court Reporters pursuant to the then existing Section 29.01, Florida Statutes. They, therefore, cannot claim status as Official Court Reporters for any time prior to 1973. Nor can the Plaintiffs be considered Official Court Reporters in 1973 or subsequent years since none of the Plaintiffs were so appointed by ‘the chief judge with the approval of a majority of the circuit judges’ in the circuit. Section 29.01(2), Florida Statutes. “Alternatively, the Plaintiffs claim they qualify as ‘Special Court Reporters’ pursuant to Section 29.07, Florida Statutes, which provides: “ ‘In case any official reporter shall not have been appointed in any circuit, or where the official reporter is disqualified or unable to perform his duties, it shall be within the discretion of the judge to appoint a special reporter in any case, civil or criminal, hpon demand of any of the parties therefor; said special reporter shall perform the same services and receive the same pay in the same manner as the official reporter.’ “Prior to Section 29.07 becoming operative, one of two conditions precedent must occur. Either (1) an Official Court Reporter shall not have been appointed, or (2) the official reporter shall have been disqualified or unable to perform his duties. If neither of these contingencies occurs, Section 29.07 does not become operative. ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.