IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
MICHAEL PITCHER,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D17-1937
SUSAN SCHNEIDER,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed February 23, 2018
Appeal from the Circuit Court
for Brevard County,
George Paulk, Judge.
Eduardo J. Mejias, of AAA Family Law,
LLC, Altamonte Springs, for Appellant.
Harley I. Gutin, Cocoa, for Appellee.
COHEN, C.J.
Susan Schneider and Michael Pitcher are the unmarried parents of two minor
children. Pitcher appeals a final judgment establishing paternity, raising several issues
that all pertain to the trial court’s determination of the time-sharing schedule for the parties’
children. Pitcher acknowledges that there is no trial transcript or other recreation of the
testimony and evidence presented below. However, he maintains that the trial court’s
legal errors are evident on the face of the final judgment and thus a transcript is
unnecessary.
Pitcher’s argument lacks merit. Without a transcript, “we cannot resolve the
underlying factual issues in order to determine whether the trial court’s judgment . . . is
without evidentiary support.” See McQuade v. Holroyd,
(Fla.
1979)). Indeed, having reviewed the record, as well as the extensive final judgment and
parenting plan, we conclude that Pitcher has failed to carry his burden of demonstrating
any error. See Applegate,
.
Nonetheless, we write to acknowledge the excellence of the trial court’s final
judgment of paternity entered in this case. The judgment is thorough, applies the correct
legal standards, and is replete with fact-finding and analysis. Appellate courts are error
correcting courts, and while Pitcher may not agree with the trial court’s findings, “it is not
the role of an appellate court . . . to substitute its judgment for that of the trial court.” See
G.C. v. Dep’t of Child. & Fams.,
