Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 236 SW 477 - Moore v. State

Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1921

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
July 1982
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 1982

6 state decisions

301921193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of Houston v. Scottish Rite Benev. Ass'n · 89 Tex. Crim. 199 - Kerley v. State · 61 Tex. Crim. 372 - Slack v. State · 68 Tex. Crim. 315 - Walker v. State · 58 Tex. Crim. 223 - Newman v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The doctrine of prompt outcry and report does not apply to rape with consent in 'under age' cases as it does to rape by force.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.