¶1 ORDER
¶2 Judith Decker-Wegener (“Wife”) appeals the judgment granting Michael Weg-ener’s (“Husband”) motion for summary judgment on Wife’s petition in equity seeking to reopen the parties’ dissolution decree and set aside the decree’s finding that maintenance is non-modifiable. We find that the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of Husband. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).