Bissell v. Baumgardner’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1)If, upon review of the petition, as provided for in KRS 403.735, the court determines that the allegations contained therein indicate the presence of an immediate and present danger of domestic violence and abuse, the court shall issue, upon proper motion, ex parte, an emergency protective order: (a) Restraining the adverse party from any contact or communication with the petitioner except as directed by the court; (b) Restraining the adverse party from committing further acts of domestic violence and abuse; (c) Restraining the adverse party from disposing of or damaging any of the property of the parties; (d) Restraining the adverse party from going to or within a specified distance of a specifically described residence, school, or place of employment of the petitioner, minor child of the petitioner, family member, or member of an unmarried couple protected in the order; (e) Directing the adverse party to vacate the residence shared by the parties to the action; (f) Utilizing the criteria set forth in KRS 403.270, 403.320, and KRS 403.822, grant temporary custody; (g) Restraining the adverse party from approaching the petitioner or a minor child of the petitioner within a distance specified in the order, not to exceed five hundred (500) feet; or (h) Enter other orders the court believes will be of assistance in eliminating future acts of domestic violence and abuse; or any combination thereof, except that the use of a global positioning monitoring system shall not be orde”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Guenther v. Guenther

2. “the burden of proof required for recusal of a trial judge is an onerous one. There must be a showing of facts of a character calculated seriously to impair the judge's impartiality and sway his judgment.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Quattrocchi v. Nicholls

3. “the court's exercise of temporary emergency jurisdiction does not impinge upon the superior jurisdiction of the [Tennessee] courts to make the final custody determination.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. R.B. v. S.M.