Cuda v. Keller’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[tjhere is no requirement of actually succeeding in placing another in fear of physical harm”). In reaching its holding, the court in Cuda found the Parkhurst opinion inapposite. Id. at 91. We believe the issue in Cuda is distinct from a requirement that a petitioner prove an immediate and present danger of future abuse from the respondent to obtain an initial full order of protection. One could be the victim of an”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. McAlister v. Strohmeyer

2. “includes but is not limited to the occurrence of any of the following acts, attempts or threats against a person who may be protected pursuant to [Chapter 455] ...: (a) “Assault”, purposely or knowingly placing or attempting to place another in fear of physical harm; (b) “Battery”, purposely or knowingly causing physical harm to another with or without a deadly weapon; [[Image here]]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. N.M. v. Matthew Ray Martin

3. “`The trial court is free to believe or disbelieve all, part, or none of the testimony of any witness.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Burris v. Mercer County