236 U.S. App. D.C. 72 - Grano v. Barry’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · United States v. W. T. Grant Co. · United States v. Munsingwear, Inc. · Southern Pacific Terminal Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission · Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National Union
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“negotiate with the owners of Rhodes Tavern to determine whether said owners will enter into an agreement to fulfill the objectives declared in”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Grano v. Barry“requirement. Under United States v. W.T. Grant Co., 345 U.S. 629 , 73 S.Ct. 894, 97 L.Ed. 1303 (1953), a case is moot if”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Grano v. Barry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.