Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 236 Va. 448 - Bennett v. Commonwealth

Bennett v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
3
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 61 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently November 2013 · most notably Spencer v. Commonwealth (1989), Satcher v. Commonwealth (1992)

4 federal appellate · 61 state decisions

3401988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wainwright v. Witt · Williams v. Florida · Durfee v. Duke · People of State of New York Halvey v. Halvey · Johnson v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is not desirable for the Commonwealth's Attorney to testify as a witness on a material point in a case. The circumstances are rare indeed where any lawyer may properly testify in a case in which he is participating as an advocate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “even though the new witnesses [in Webb] helped convict the accused, the Fourth Circuit said there was a 'total lack of prejudice to the defendant.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[b]y granting the continuance, the state trial court showed that it was 'scrupulously interested in insuring that justice be done.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.