In Re S.W’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 198 W. Va. 79 - In Re Katie S. · 196 W. Va. 239 - Carter v. Carter · 177 W. Va. 688 - State Ex Rel. W.Va. Department of Human Services v. Cheryl M. · 182 W. Va. 57 - David M. v. Margaret M. · 182 W. Va. 448 - Honaker v. Burnside
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[w]hen this Court reviews challenges to the findings and conclusions of the circuit court, a two-prong deferential standard of review is applied. We review the final order and the ultimate disposition under an abuse of discretion standard, and we review the circuit court’s underlying factual findings under a clearly erroneous standard.” Syl., McCormick v. Allstate Ins. Co., 197 W.Va. 415 , 475 S.E.2d 507 (1996).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.