State v. Warner’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently April 1985 · most notably State v. Collins (1972), State v. Lewis (1970)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Carroll v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Brinegar v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(b) Instructions. At the close of the evidence, or at such earlier time during the trial as the court reasonably directs, any party may file written requests that the court instruct the jury on the law as set forth in the requests. At the same time copies of such requests shall be furnished to the adverse parties. The court shall inform counsel of its proposed action upon the requests prior to their arguments to the jury, but the court shall instruct the jury after the arguments are completed. No party shall assign as error any portion of the charge or omission therefrom unless he objects thereto before the jury retires to consider its verdict, stating distinctly the matter to which he objects and the grounds of his objection. Opportunity shall be given to make the objection out of the hearing and presence of the jury.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Weeks““ ‘Probable cause’ is synonymous with ‘reasonable grounds’. State v. MacKenzie, 161 Me. 123 , 210 A.2d 24 (1965). Probable cause has been defined as the evidence required to persuade a man of reasonable caution to believe that a crime is being committed or that it has been committed. Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 162 , 45 S.Ct. 280 , 69 L.Ed. 543, 552 , 39 A.L.R. 790 (1925); Henry v. United States, 361 U.S. 98, 102 , 80 S.Ct. 168 , 4 L.Ed.2d 134 (1959). Less proof is required than to establish guilt and hearsay may be considered on the issue of probable cause. Draper v. United States, 358 U.S. 307, 311-313 , 79 S.Ct. 329 , 3 L.Ed.2d 327 (1959).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mimmovich““It is a well recognized exception to the hearsay rule that when a witness has testified to material facts, any acts or declarations of his, appearing inconsistent, are competent impeachment,” citing State v. Hume, 146 Me. 129, 142 , 78 A.2d 496 (1951); State v. Mosley, 133 Me. 168 , 175 A. 307 (1934).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Nason
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.