Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 237 ARIZ 423 - State v. Jurden

State v. Jurden’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. Ohio · Whalen v. United States · Albernaz v. United States · Ohio v. Johnson · Sanabria v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]ll the more when I watch the video in this ease, it’s all one incident and it starts and it just continues. ... Perhaps, if there were some lengthy delay between one event and another, there might be a better justification of the idea of consecutive sentences. But this all starts and ends in just one big melee, really, and so the idea of consecutive sentences here doesn’t seem appropriate to me, under the circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.