Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 237 Ark. 391 - Epps v. Remmel

Epps v. Remmel’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
February 1976
most recently cited

23 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 63 Cal. App. 2d 324 - Schaefer v. Lenahan · 63 So. 2d 636 - Woods v. City of Palatka · United States v. Dollar · Major v. Fraser · Sternitzke v. Donahue's Jewelers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * To take a simple example, if in an action on a promissory note, the defendant in his answer denies the making of the note; the plaintiff makes a motion for a sumimary judgment, accompanying it by an affidavit of a person who swears that he saw the defendant sign the note; and the defendant does not file an opposing affidavit, summary judgment should be rendered for the plaintiff. ’'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““* * * The opposition to the motion cannot always successfully take his stand on the content of his pleading alone. If the movant makes a case for summary judgment the opponent must come from behind ‘the shielding cloak of formal allegations and demonstrate a genuine issue.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.