Hogg v. Darden’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1977
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on DeLong v. Green · Charles v. State · Baldwin, Trustees Mo. Pac. R.R. v. Hunnicutt · Missouri Pacific Transportation Co. v. Johnson · Malone v. Riley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It has long been recognized in this State that ‘litigants in civil cases, as well as in criminal cases, have the right to examine the jurors separately in order to determine whether such jurors are subject to challenge for cause, or to elicit information on which to base the right of peremptory challenge, subject of course to the right of the Court to control the extent of such examination, acting in its sound discretion.’ ” (Emphasis ours.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tatum v. Rester
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.