Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 237 ARK 642 - Lofton v. Bryan

Lofton v. Bryan’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2007
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2007

8 state decisions

4019631970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brothers v. Dierks Lumber & Coal Co. · Hobbs-Western Company v. Craig · Huffstettler v. Lion Oil Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There it was held that the operator of a bulk plant who distributed Lion products to retailers who had contracted with Lion to sell the company’s products, was not an independent contractor but a subcontractor In the case at bar it is not shown that Dierks had any contract with a third person in connection with the timber, and therefore, it cannot be said that one who is getting out the timber for Dierks is a subcontractor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.