Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 237 ARK 852 - Muldrew v. Dodson

Muldrew v. Dodson’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2019

6 state decisions

20196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hudson v. Hudson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It would be unjust to apply the [statutory] limitation in this instance, not only because a public officer was at fault in the matter but also because, in a doubtful situation, we prefer to give effect to the testator's intention by upholding the will.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.