Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 237 ARK 92 - Hatchett v. Robinson

Hatchett v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1966
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Stiewel v. Lally · Haering Oil Co. v. Beasley · Sharp v. West

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is true that parties to a written agreement may orally modify the terms by mutual agreement or consent of the contracting parties.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.