Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

237 Ark. 922

Weir v. Hill

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 6, 1964

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1964-04-06

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 1972

10 state decisions

Relies on Vire v. Vire

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1964-04-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Gteorge Rose Smith, J.

¶1This appears to he an action brought by the appellee to recover judgment upon six promissory notes executed by the appellant. We do not reach the merits, for under Rule 9 we are compelled to affirm the the judgment. The appellant has submitted only a statement of the case, a list of the points relied upon for reversal, and a brief. There is no abstract of the pleadings, the judgment, or the testimony that was heard below. To determine the facts in the case we should have to explore the record, which is contrary to our practice. Vire v. Vire, 236 Ark. 740, 368 S. W. 2d 265.

¶2Affirmed.

/237/ark/922 · .json · Public domain