Cude v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2011 · most notably Employment Division Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. L Smith (1990), Davis v. Smith (1979)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Reynolds v. States · Henning Jacobson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Zucht v. King · City of New Braunfels v. Waldschmidt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * According to the great weight of authority, it is within the police power of the State to require that school children be vaccinated against smallpox, and that such requirement does not violate the constitutional rights of anyone, on religious grounds or otherwise. In fact, this principle is so firmly settled that no extensive discussion is required.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In Jacobson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 , 25 S.Ct. 358 , 49 L.Ed. 643 , the Supreme Court of the United States considered the matter of compulsory vaccination as infringing on rights claimed under the United States Constitution, and held that a State law requiring compulsory vaccination did not deprive a citizen of liberty guaranteed by the United States Constitution. More recently, in the case of Zucht v. King, 260 U.S. 174 , 43 S.Ct. 24, 25 , 67 L.Ed. 194 , the United States Supreme Court again considered the matter of compulsory vaccination; and Mr. Justice Brandeis, speaking for the Court said: `* * * Long before this suit was instituted, Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 , 25 S.Ct. 358 , 49 L.Ed. 643 , 3 Ann.Cas. 765, had settled that it is within the police power of a state to provide for compulsory vaccination.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It is clear that the law [Ark. Stat.Ann. § 80-1502 (Repl.1960) ] requires that the children attend school, and a valid regulation [Health Board Regulation #21, 1960 Revision] requires that they be vaccinated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.