Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 237 BR 203 - In Re Wilbur

In Re Wilbur’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
September 2018
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 350 · 11 U.S.C. § 727

Relies on Johnson v. Home State Bank · New Jersey Department of Corrections v. Nash · Ohio v. Kovacs · Farrey v. Sanderfoot · Avellino & Bienes v. M. Frenville Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[U]nder federal law, an indemnity agreement creates a contingent claim as of the date of the agreement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.