State v. Faust’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
75 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably State v. Montgomery (2000), State v. Schiappa (1999)
75 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sandstrom v. Montana · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · State v. Golding · Taylor v. Louisiana · Duren v. Missouri
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“information upon which the trial court may decide which prospective jurors ... should be excused for cause ... and ... information to counsel which may aid them in the exercise of their right to peremptory challenge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`[t]hrough these statutes, the Connecticut legislature has defined the community for purposes of jury selection to be the judicial district instead of the county.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.