237 Conn. 919
Decided May 28, 1996
Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 1996-05-28
Relies on State v. Corbeil
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1996-05-28
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently October 2022
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 41 Conn. App. 7 (AC 13990), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Under the state constitution, if initial statements made by a defendant are excluded only because of a Miranda violation, and not because they were coerced, must the subsequent post-Miranda statements be excluded in the absence of a showing of a break in the stream of events?”