Stotesbury v. Huber’s Empirical Analysis
237 F. 413 · 1916
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 1960
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co. · Pullman's Palace-Car Co v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania · Scudder v. Union National Bank · Eva Ingersoll v. Joseph a Coram a H · Gelpcke et al. v. The City of Dubuque
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.