In re SAMUELS’s Empirical Analysis
237 F. 796 · 1916
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
February 1919
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on Everett v. Judson · Burlingham v. Crouse · In re White · Burlingham v. Crouse · In re Coleman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(3) powers which he might have exercised for his 'own benefit, but not those which he might have exercised for some other person, . . .. (5) property which prior to the filing of the petition he could by any means have transferred or which might have been levied upon and sold under judicial process against him: Provided, That when any bankrupt shalThave any insurance policy which has a cash surrender value payable to himself, his estate, or personal representatives, he may, within thirty days after the cash surrender .value has been ascertained and stated to the trustee- by the company issuing.the same, pay or secure 'to the trustee the sum so ascertained and stated, and continue to hold, own, and carry such policy free from the claims , of thevcredifors participating in the distribution of his estate under the bankruptcy proceedings, otherwise the policy, shall pass to the trustee as assets; . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cohen v. Samuels
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.