Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. Lawson’s Empirical Analysis
237 F. 877 · 1916
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 1953
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bailey v. Baker Ice Machine Co. · Carey v. Donohue · In re Bothe · Post v. Berry · Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Holcomb
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There can be no question but that the orders signed by Brom, and the delivery of the goods thereunder, constituted a conditional sale. Language could not be plainer.”,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.