Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

237 F.2d 168

Docket No. 12762.

Duffy v. Vaughan

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1956-06-25

Cited by 2 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1967

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Vaughan v. Dickinson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1956-06-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Rosemary Scott, Grand Rapids, Mich., Thomas Cooch, Wilmington, Del., for appellant.

James A. Vaughan, New York City, for appellee.

Before MARTIN, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying the petition of the appellant trustee in bankruptcy to intervene as of right in an action pending in that court. Despite the ingenious arguments of able counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that the court was not in error in denying the petition. Upon the reasoning of Judge Starr's thoroughly considered opinion and the authorities cited therein, the order of the district court is affirmed. Vaughan v. Dickinson, D.C. 19 F.R.D. 323.

/237/f2d/168 · .json · Public domain