Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 237 F.2d 190 - Thedorf v. Lipsey

Thedorf v. Lipsey’s Empirical Analysis

237 F.2d 190 · 1956

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
7
states following
November 2000
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 3 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently November 2000 · most notably Domeracki v. Humble Oil & Refining Co. (1971), Sherry Ex Rel. Sherry v. Asing (1975)

25 federal appellate · 3 district · 9 state decisions

140195619601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Skidmore v. Baltimore & O. R. · Suydam v. Williamson · Ward v. Cochran · Carpenter v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is for the court to decide upon the jury's answers ... what the resulting legal obligation is.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It is reversible error * * * [for the court] to inform the jury expressly or by necessary implication of the effect of an answer * * * to a question * # # of the special verdict upon the ultimate right of either party litigant to recover or upon the ultimate liability of either party litigant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Both federal and state courts have generally adopted the ... view ... that for the court to inform the jury of the effect of its answers is prejudicial error requiring a new trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.