Weinhaus v. Gale’s Empirical Analysis
237 F.2d 197 · 1956
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 1988
3 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Goldstein v. Groesbeck · McQuillen v. National Cash Register Co. · H F G Co. v. Pioneer Pub. Co. · 116 F. Supp. 223 - Henis v. Compania Agricola De Guatemala · 93 F. Supp. 9 - Pergament v. Frazer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“That wrong, if such it be, was neither enhanced nor diminished by anything that subsequently took place. The fact, unexplained, that such shares were sold by Edison almost a year later at a greatly increased price might tend to prove they were purchased from Gas Company for less than their true value, but such sale certainly did not constitute a wrong to plaintiff and other stockholders of Gas Company.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Zilker v. Klein
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.