Plummer v. United States

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Feb. 27, 1956.

Decided March 29, 1956.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1956-03-29

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 1967

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1956-03-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1.Mr. John D. Fauntleroy, Washington, D- C. (appointed by the District Court), for appellant.

¶2■ Mr.-E. Tillman Stirling, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U.-S. Atty., -Lewis Carroll and Joel D. *205Blackwell, Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee.

¶3Before BAZELON, WASHINGTON and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Reversal of this conviction, for taking indecent liberties with a child, D.C. Code, § 22-3501 (a), is urged on the ground that the trial court erred in refusing to direct an acquittal. We think the trial court was clearly right.

¶6Affirmed.