237 F.2d 229
Docket Nos. 15239, 15240.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Oct. 2, 1956.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1956-10-02
2 counsel of record
Relies on Bateman v. Donovan · United States v. Hayes
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1956-10-02
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently December 2011 · most notably Canterbury v. Spence (1972), 8 Cal. 3d 551 - Coffee v. McDonnell Douglas Corp. (1972)
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 14 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
Vergeer & Samuels, Duane Vergeer, Portland, Or., for appellant.
Sabin & Malarkey, Verne W. Newcomb, Portland, Or., for appellee.
Before STEPHENS, CHAMBERS, and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The motion of appellee to dismiss appeals is granted upon the ground that an appeal from an order granting a new trial is not appealable. See Bateman v. Donovan, 9 Cir., 1942, 131 F.2d 759; United States v. Hayes, 9 Cir., 172 F.2d 677, 679.