Duke Khan v. Immigration and Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis
237 F.3d 1143 · 2001
Citation profile
17 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Qin Wen Zheng v. Gonzales (2007), Georgis v. Ashcroft (2003)
17 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Shabanali Ladha v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Espinoza v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Vides-vides v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Chew v. Boyd · Hoonsilapa v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it was error to exclude documents verifying the petitioner's testimony that [s]he had been arrested and detained for lack of certification when the denial of asylum was based in part on the lack of corroborating evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Documents may be authenticated in immigration proceedings through any recognized procedure, such as those required by INS regulations or by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“8 C.F.R. § 287.6 provides one, but not the exclusive, method for establishing a sufficient basis for admission of a writing in a deportation proceeding,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.