Tapia Garcia v. Immigration & Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis
237 F.3d 1216 · 2001
Citation profile
65 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 122 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably Ngarurih v. Ashcroft (2004), Fernandez-Bernal v. Attorney General of the United States (2001)
65 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Spencer v. Kemna · Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 122 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The [ (statute) ] divests courts of jurisdiction only if an alien ‘is removable by reason of having committed a criminal offense.’ 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(C) (emphasis added). It does not say that courts lack jurisdiction if the ... alien is found deportable for commission of certain criminal offenses [by the IJ/BIA]. Thus, the statutory language clearly requires that we determine whether [the triggering statutory] conditions exist before dismissing the appeal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“inability to re-enter and reside legally in the United States with his family is a collateral consequence of his deportation because it is clearly imposed as a matter of law”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“final order of removal against an alien who is removable by reason of having committed”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.