United States of America v. Peter Simonelli’s Empirical Analysis
237 F.3d 19 · 2001
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 4 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably United States v. Griffin (2008), United States v. Zidell (2003)
27 federal appellate · 4 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Hudson v. United States · Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. United States · Tome v. United States · State Oil Co. v. Khan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[P]rior consistent statements must at least have 'some rebutting force beyond the mere fact that the witness has repeated on a prior occasion a statement consistent with his trial testimony.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“There is no rule admitting all prior consistent statements simply to bolster the credibility of a witness who has been impeached by particulars.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“was not to show there was really no inconsistency but to show that [the witness] did not lie about everything and that most of what else he had to say at trial was consistent with what he had said earlier to the grand jury”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hazelton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.