Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

237 F.3d 348

Docket No. 99-1650.

Inez Sales

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

FILED: November 29, 2000.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 2001

1 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

ORDER

¶1

(CA-96-27-L)

¶2

Appellants filed on August 30, 2000 a petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc. On September 25, 2000, the appellees filed a memorandum in opposition to the petition for rehearing.

¶3

Judge Widener voted to grant panel rehearing. Judges Luttig and Williams voted to deny.

¶4

A member of the Court requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc. The poll failed to produce a majority of the judges in active service in favor of rehearing en banc. Judges Widener, Niemeyer, and King voted to rehear the case en banc, and Judges Wilkinson, Wilkins, Luttig, Williams, Michael, Motz and Traxler voted against rehearing en banc. The Court denies the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc.

¶5

Entered at the direction of Judge Luttig for the Court.

/237/f3d/348 · .json · Public domain