Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 237 F.3d 538 - Albert Adams

Albert Adams’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2023

4 state decisions

90200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Catlin v. United States · Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp. · Forsythe International, S.A. v. Gibbs Oil Co. · Nederlandse Erts-Tankersmaatschappij, N.V. v. Isbrandtsen Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “plaintiffs filed suit in Louisiana state court. AEGIS was then named as a defendant under the Louisiana Direct Action Statute.... AEGIS removed the entire action to federal district court pursuant to the Convention.... The plaintiffs moved to remand the case back to state court. The district court denied the motion to remand because AEGIS articulated an arbitrable dispute and the litigation related to the dispute within the meaning of the Convention. ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The forum selection concerns of a non-party are not remotely commensurate to the impediment to the federal policy favoring arbitration created by redundant arbitration or potential impairment of the signatories' rights to arbitrate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Through Section 16, Congress intended to promote arbitration by `permitting interlocutory appeals of orders favoring litigation over arbitration and precluding review of interlocutory orders that favor arbitration.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Brown

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.