Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 237 FRD 440 - In re Urethane Antitrust Litigation

In re Urethane Antitrust Litigation’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
September 2014
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 10 district ·

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act)

Relies on Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor · General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon · Holmberg v. Armbrecht · Visa Check/mastermoney Antitrust Litigation v. Usa · Adamson v. Bowen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “• class certification was appropriate for resolution of “the more difficult, threshold liability issues,” and • if individualized questions were to overwhelm the damages issue, “ ‘the more appropriate course of action would be to bifurcate a damages phase and/or decertify the class as to individualized damages determinations.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.