Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 237 FSUPP 282 - Varga v. Rosenberg

Varga v. Rosenberg’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
July 1994
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 1994

7 federal appellate · 2 district ·

1001964197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Jones v. Cunningham · Brownell v. We Shung · Goto v. Lane · Isabella Gonzales v. William Williams · 202 Cal. App. 2d 191 - People v. Rodriguez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “convicted of a violation of, . . . (a) law or regulation relating to the illicit . . . traffic in narcotic drugs”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. SUM · Chang-Salazar v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
  2. ““ . . . Ordinarily habeas corpus is not available when there is another remedy in the regular course. However, one of the recognized exceptions occurs in the case where the judgment under which petitioner is held is wholly void. Goto v. Lane, 265 U.S. 393 , 44 S.Ct. 525 , 68 L.Ed. 1070 (1923).” (Emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Peña v. U. S. Department of Justice, Immigration & Naturalization Service
  3. “who at any time has been convicted of a violation of, * * * any law or regulation relating to illicit possession of or traffic in narcotic drugs or marihuana * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. SUM

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.