237 F. Supp. 320 - In re Eade’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
September 1984
most recently cited
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on 64 Cal. App. 778 - Baker v. Baker · Southwick v. Davis · 36 Cal. 2d 202 - Thorsby v. Babcock · Samuels v. Delucchi · 20 F. Supp. 924 - In re Sterling
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]here the review of the [Bankruptcy] Referee's order is to test a conclusion of law based upon admitted or established facts, this Court is free to take a different view). See also Bonnette v. California Health and Welfare Agency, 704 F.2d 1465 , 1469 (9th Cir.1983) (holding that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““(5) That they estimate the actual cash value of the land and premises hereinabove described to be in excess of Twelve Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($12,-500.00).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Morse
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.