237 F. Supp. 2d 7 - Taucher v. Rainer’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 29 U.S.C. § 433 · 7 U.S.C. § 12A · 7 U.S.C. § 6
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Pierce v. Underwood · Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for Vincent · United States v. Harriss · Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the weighty presumption against its validity by casting the registration scheme as a content-neutral regulation advancing important governmental interests unrelated to the suppression of speech. Id. at 11-12. 10 In a more summary fashion, the magistrate judge rejected the substantiality of the CFTC's argument that Section 4m was a regulation of a profession that did not implicate the First Amendment in the first place. The magistrate judge regarded the difference between”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“to ignore the cases upon which [the district court] relied that discuss the distinction between a professional's advice to a client and a writer's advice to whoever ... will read her and use it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“so self-evident and obvious that the defendants' ignoring it cannot be justified.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.