Kai Peng v. Uber Technologies, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph · Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute · Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. · At&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[c]ourts applying New York law have refused to find that fee-splitting provisions in arbitration agreements are unenforceable where plaintiffs have not affirmatively demonstrated that the fee-splitting provisions would preclude them from pursuing their rights in the arbitral forum”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the basis of challenge [must] be directed specifically to the agreement to arbitrate before the court will intervene.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.