Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 237 Ga. 399 - Williams v. State

Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2019

12 state decisions

7019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Choice v. State · Massey v. State · Drewry v. State · Morgan v. State · Adams v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is clear that once the issue of insanity at the time of the commission of the alleged offense is raised by the evidence it is mandatory upon the trial judge to charge the jury under the provisions of Code Ann. § 27-1503 (Rev. 1972) relating to the form of the verdict in case they should find the defendant not guilty by reason of insanity. Morgan v. State, 224 Ga. 604 (2) ( 163 SE2d 690 ) (1968).” Williams v. State, 237 Ga. 399, 400 ( 228 SE2d 806 ). The only evidence which might be seen to raise the issue of insanity was the appellant’s testimony that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.