Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 237 Ga. App. 595 - Anderson v. State

237 Ga. App. 595 - Anderson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Hayes v. State · Sands v. State · Johnson v. State · 225 Ga. App. 26 - Mitchell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]hat some evidence offered by a witness seems contradictory to his own or to some other’s, or incomplete or uncertain, does not automatically discredit the evidence given by that witness, or others, for it is the function of the triers of fact to determine to what evidence it gives credence. It is not for us to determine or question how the jury resolved any apparent conflicts or uncertainties in the evidence. Rather, on appeal, we indulge every contingency in favor of the verdict.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.