Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 237 Ga. App. 719 - Binns v. State

237 Ga. App. 719 - Binns v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Thornton v. State · 187 Ga. App. 387 - Moore v. State · Bridges v. State · 204 Ga. App. 88 - Racquemore v. State · 212 Ga. App. 60 - Wells v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he decision of whether statements which impermissibly place a defendant’s character in issue are so prejudicial as to warrant a mistrial is for the discretion of the trial court. Appellate courts will look at the relevant circumstances to determine if the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion for mistrial. Some of the factors and circumstances to be reviewed include the nature of the statement, the other evidence in the case, and the action taken by the court and counsel concerning the impropriety.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.