Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 237 Ga. App. 91 - Thompson v. State

237 Ga. App. 91 - Thompson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Allison v. State · 228 Ga. App. 788 - Etheridge v. State · Smith v. State · 232 Ga. App. 494 - Kennon v. State · 165 Ga. App. 55 - Fuller v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rebuttal testimony should not be excluded merely because the state could have introduced it during its main case. Each case must be decided on its own merits. It is the importance of the evidence to the state’s main case and whether the withholding was intended or designed to deny the defendant an opportunity to prepare his defense in relation to that evidence which will determine if reversible error has occurred. [Cit.] 11”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.