State v. Wise’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 73 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably State v. Hall (1990), State v. Engelhardt (2005)
2 federal appellate · 73 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dunn v. United States · Angrist v. United States · State v. Lamb · State v. Voiles · State v. Fisher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The Kansas rule has been frequently stated and is clear: In the absence of a stipulation between the parties, the results of a polygraph examination are not admissible in evidence. State v. Crossman, 229 Kan. 384, 389 , 624 P.2d 461 (1981); State v. Nemechek, 223 Kan. 766 , Syl. ¶ 3, 576 P.2d 682 (1978); and State v. Blosser, 221 Kan. 59 , Syl. ¶ 1, 558 P.2d 105 (1976). Here there was no stipulation. To permit the defendant to introduce the results of the test, or even to refer to the giving of the test, would have been improper.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Mason““Does the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, convince the appellate court that any rational factfinder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt?” State v. Wise, 237 Kan. 117, 119 , 697 P.2d 1295 (1985).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hicks“[A]n acquittal of the underlying felony is not inconsistent with a conviction of felony murder.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Gomez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.