Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 237 Ky. 283 - Spencer v. Commonwealth

Spencer v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
October 1959
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mann's v. Leyman Motor Company · Hicks' Administratrix v. Harlan Hospital · Neace v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Section 11 of our Constitution provides that in all criminal prosecutions the accused has the right to be heard by himself and counsel. Ordinarily the court should permit the attorney employed and selected by the accused to represent him at all stages of the trial. Here, however, the appellant informed the court when he was arraigned that he had no counsel, and the court appointed two attorneys to represent him. A careful inspection of the record shows that Mr. Eversole had represented appellant throughout the trial with ability, his examination and cross-examination of the witnesses evincing a thorough familiarity with the facts, and, under the circumstances, the trial court did not abuse a sound discretion in refusing- to permit an attorney employed during the last stages of the trial to make the argument before the jury. Appellant was not deprived of any constitutional right.” (Emphasis ours.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.