Maynard v. Damron’s Empirical Analysis
1931
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 1991
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hudson Engineering Co. v. Shaw · Edwards-Barnard Co. v. Pflanz · Cincinnati Stucco Co. v. North Kentucky Fair, Inc. · Turner Elkhorn Coal Company v. Smith · American Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Nickey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is a general rale that an attachment defendant may by his conduct waive or become estopped to assert the non-existence of the grounds for an attachment. [Citation omitted.] Where the claim in litigation is settled between the parties, no further inquiry will be made to determine whether an attachment was properly sued out. [Citations omitted.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brown v. Fulton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.