Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 237 Md. 438 - Siemiesz v. Amend

Siemiesz v. Amend’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
2
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 4 district · 44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably Wimmer v. Wimmer (1980), Mayor of Annapolis v. West Annapolis Fire & Improvement Co. (1972)

4 federal appellate · 4 district · 44 state decisions

220196519701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on O'Connor v. Estevez · Fitch v. Double" U" Sales Corp. · Sands v. Church of the Ascension & Prince of Peace · Fasman v. Pottashnick · Carter v. Abramo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Implied trusts may be either resulting or constructive trusts. A resulting trust arises upon the presumed intention of the parties where the terms of the disposition or accompanying facts establish that beneficial interest is not to go with legal title.” Siemiesz v. Amend, 237 Md. 438, 441 , 206 A. 2d 723 (1965).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.