Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1927-01-03
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1951
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
¶1I agree with Justice BIRD that the case must be reversed for the exclusion of statements made by the deceased mother of petitioner during her lifetime, which were admissible on the question of pedigree. The testimony of Mr. Raby as to nonaccess or as to facts tending to establish nonaccess was properly rejected. See Yanoff v. Yanoff, post, 383, and authorities there cited.
¶2SHARPE, C.J., and SNOW, WIEST, and CLARK, JJ., concurred with FELLOWS, J. *383