Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 237 N.C. 148 - Stansel v. McIntyre

Stansel v. McIntyre’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
3
states following
February 2002
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently February 2002 · most notably Keitz v. National Paving & Contracting Co. (1957), Masters v. Dunstan (1962)

42 state decisions

210195319601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Leary v. . Land Bank · Snyder v. Kenan Oil Co. · Tarkington v. Printing Co. · Pascal Ex Rel. Pascal v. Burke Transit Co. · Freeman v. . Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Hence, if it be found that the automobile in question was owned and maintained by James H. Austin, and was being operated by Mrs. Austin, all within the family purpose doctrine, quaere, is he, James H. Austin, under the principle of respondeat superior, estopped by the judgment on the verdict in the Scotland County cases in respect to the issues on which original defendants now seek contribution from Mrs. Austin? Compare Leary v. Virginia-Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank, supra.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]t is not necessary that precisely the same parties were plaintiffs and defendants in the two suits; provided the same subject in controversy, between two or more of the parties”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.